Communities of Practice: What Really Makes Them Work?
- 13 hours ago
- 3 min read
March's Conversation At The Edge with Ana Barfield (Aga Khan Foundation) and Alexandre Eisenchteter (Stormz) served as a fantastic space to unpack what truly motivates engagement in the real world through purpose, participation, and design. The conversation surfaced a clear, shared understanding: Communities of Practice (CoPs) thrive when they are human, simple, and built for real‑world learning rather than performance.
The interactive session was so rich, we couldn't resist sharing some of the insights here too. You can also scroll down to watch the session back in full.

1. CoPs are not committees - they are curiosity engines
As Ana Barfield put it:
“a community of practice is not a working group. It is a community that is driven by curiosity and wanting to learn from each other... even without a very clear roadmap.”
This shift - from output to exploration - is what unlocks genuine learning across boundaries.
2. They create connection where isolation is the norm
Alex Eisenchteter described CoPs as a space that allows people to be:
“together alone, or alone together.”
For dispersed practitioners, this connection is not a luxury. It’s a lifeline.
3. Motivation is personal - and that’s a feature, not a bug
Both speakers converged on a simple truth: people join when there’s something in it for them.
Skill‑building, reassurance, visibility, and networking all matter. As Ana noted:
“giving staff visibility is really powerful.”
4. Simplicity is the design principle that makes everything else possible
Alex captured it perfectly:
“One super important word… simplicity. It has to be simple.”
Over‑engineering kills momentum. CoPs flourish when the barrier to entry is low and the experience feels natural.
5. The right atmosphere matters more than the right agenda
Ana offered the metaphor that became the heartbeat of the session:

Spontaneous, informal, energising - a place where people can show up as they are, share what’s real, and learn in the flow of conversation.
6. Sustainability comes from shared ownership
CoPs cannot depend on a single champion. As Alex emphasised:
“it needs to be self‑supporting… it cannot rely on a few individuals.”
The community must carry itself.
So what?
At their best, Communities of Practice remind us that learning is social, not solitary. When we design for curiosity, connection, and ease, we create spaces where people don’t just exchange knowledge — they expand what’s possible together.
May we keep building those spaces, one conversation at a time.
Watch the recording here:
Further reading:
If you'd like some further reading afterwards, guests have shared the below so you can go deeper.
“Design Principles for CoPs”. These are the outcomes of the “CoP of CoPs” from the Aga Khan Foundation. Thanks to Ana, image:

CoP Design Principles - Aga Khan Foundation The “Creative Activities for Work Teams and Communities of Practice”. A toolkit developed at the conclusion of the “CoP of CoPs” process (see above). Thanks to Ana for sharing.
“Virtual Facilitation Techniques for Work Teams and Communities of Practice” deck developed around the same time as the above. Thanks to Ana for sharing.
“Fostering Learning in Large Programmes and Portfolios: Emerging Lessons from Climate Change and Sustainable Development.” Harvey, Blane, et al. , Sustainabilty, vol. 9, no. 2, 2017, p. 315. Thanks to Bruce for sharing.




Comments